Gianelli v. Briscoe
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The pleadings disclose that there is a dispute between the parties as to whether or not, for about fourteen years, there was a partnership existing in the saloon business in the city of Stockton, between Andrew Gianelli, plaintiff’s intestate, who commenced the action, and the defendant.
The complaint was filed on October 16, 1916; it was alleged that a partnership between the parties was formed in April, 1902; that it existed until July 2, 1916, at which time defendant took exclusive possession of the partnership property and has prevented plaintiff from having access thereto, and retains the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Clark v. DunnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Griffin v. OrmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1860
- In re the Estate of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Kinoshita v. HorioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Dalmau v. Quiñones DelgadoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.