Clark v. Dunnam
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Fourteenth Judicial District, County of Placer. The case out of which this arose is reported in 42 Cal. 181. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Crockett, J.:
One Jones brought an action against Clark and others, doing business as copartners with Jones, under the firm name of the “Dardanelles Mining Company,” for an accounting and a dissolution of the partnership. On the 20th of August, 1869, a decree was rendered for a dissolution of the partnership, and ordering a sale of all its property and effects, out of the proceeds of which it directed to be paid: First—The expenses of the sale. Second—Any balance due to the receiver. Third—Jones’ costs and disbursements in the action, taxed at five hundred and eighty-eight…
2Cited by24 opinions
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Zappettini v. BucklesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.