Legal Opinion

Baker v. City of Lumberton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1954No. 669PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

The only assignment of error is based upon exception to denial of defendant’s motions, aptly made, for judgment as of nonsuit.

1. It is contended, and rightly so, that the evidence shows affirmatively that the death of plaintiff’s intestate resulted from contact with a wire used by the city in transmitting electricity for street lighting purposes only, a governmental function, in the performance of which the city is not liable for tortious acts of its officers and agents. Hodges v. Charlotte, 214 N.C. 737, 200 S.E. 889; Beach v. Tarboro, 225 N.C. 26, 33 S.E. 2d 64; Alford v. Washington, 238…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Smith v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  2. Mintz v. Town of MurphySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Rice v. City of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Alford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Hamilton v. Town of HamletSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Steelman v. City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State Ex Rel. East Lenoir Sanitary District v. City of LenoirSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Troxler v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Candler v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Partin v. Carolina Power and Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API