Legal Opinion

Baldor Electric Co. v. Reasoner

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2001No. ED 79597PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Baldor Electric Company (“Employer”) appeals from a decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (the “Commission”) finding that Raylene Reasoner (“Claimant”) was not disqualified from receiving unemployment compensation benefits following her discharge for violating Employer’s Substance Abuse Policy (the “Policy”).

Employer raises two points on appeal. First, Employer argues that the Commission erred in finding that Employer’s laboratory report reflecting the results of Claimant’s drug test was inadmissible hearsay and did not constitute competent…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Gypsum Co. v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. Hurlbut v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Miller v. Kansas City Station Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Weller v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. McClelland v. Hogan Personnel, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Croy v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Tenge v. WASHINGTON GROUP INTERNATIONAL, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. City of Branson v. SantoMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Christensen v. American Food & Vending Services, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API