Legal Opinion

Glide Lumber Products Co. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 5, 1987No. 86-AB-1309; CA A41932PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Employer seeks review of EAB’s award of unemployment benefits to claimant, whom employer discharged after he tested positive for marijuana in a random drug test required by employer. The issue is whether an employe’s off-duty use of a controlled substance, in violation of his employer’s written rules, is “misconduct connected with work,” ORS 657.176(2)(a), when there is no evidence of on-the-job intoxication or impairment resulting from the drug use. EAB adopted the referee’s opinion, which held that the answer is no. We agree and affirm.

In late 1985, employer adopted an employe handbook…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Giese v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Black v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Philomath Forest Products Co. v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. National Gypsum Co. v. Kansas Employment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Veneer v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Dolan v. SvitakNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Clevenger v. Nevada Employment Security DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API