Kramer v. Metropolitan Commercial Corp.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
This is a derivative stockholders’ suit. There are eleven causes of action now set forth in the second consolidated amended complaint. Each alleges a separate transaction of the purchase or sale by the subject corporation of securities which in each instance was accomplished (as claimed) for the benefit and to the profit of one or more of the individual defendants. Initially two suits had been commenced, at different times, the first known as the Hennessey action, the second as the Heyman action. The Hennessey complaint was twice amended; the Heyman complaint was not amended. The actions were…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- O'Connor v. . Virginia Passenger Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Marco v. SachsNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Hanson v. HansonNew York Supreme Court · 1953
- Marco v. SachsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945