Legal Opinion

Marco v. Sachs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A stockholder, in a derivative action, seeks redress of alleged wrongs perpetrated on a corporation by the individual defendants. Motion by eight of the individual defendants to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency and to dismiss certain parts of the cause of action as insufficient. Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency reversed on the law, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within twenty days after service with notice of entry of the order entered hereon. Appeal from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Delaware & Hudson Co. v. Albany & Susquehanna RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Doctor v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. O'Connor v. . Virginia Passenger Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Lonsdale v. SpeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marco v. DullesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Miller v. KastnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Barr v. WackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  4. Hunsdorfer v. West Side Structural Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Kramer v. Metropolitan Commercial Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API