Legal Opinion
Hanson v. Hanson
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
The complaint sets forth a canse of action for the recovery of moneys claimed to be due under an alleged agreement. The defendant moves for an order pursuant to rule 102 of the Buies of Civil Practice to require the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint so as to make the same more definite and certain by alleging whether the agreement was oral or in writing; and if in writing by setting forth a copy thereof, or if oral by pleading its substance.
*397The authorities seem to be divided as to whether the principal relief is appropriate under the procedure invoked by the defendant or whether the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- First Presbyterian Church v. KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Swartmore Textile Co. v. Morris Bernhard Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Russell v. BooksNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. New York Movers Tariff Bureau, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
- Cambridge Factors v. State Bank of Long BeachNew York Supreme Court · 1962
- Connecticut Telephone & Electric Corp. v. Telephone Answering & Recording Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1955
- Kommel v. ZuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.