Legal Opinion
Genstar Chemical Ltd. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 25, 1981No. Nos. 80-1170, 80-1752 and 80-1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge THORNBERRY.
THORNBERRY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Genstar Chemical Limited filed a claim with the Interstate Commerce Commission against some thirty railroads to recover for alleged overcharges on shipments between the United States and Canada. The Commission awarded Genstar only a fraction of the amount requested. Genstar then filed a petition for review of the Commission order in federal district court as well as a direct review petition in this court. The district court granted Genstar’s motion for summary judgment, and the Commission and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. ICCSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Davis v. Portland Seed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenors. Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Western Maryland Railway Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Pullman-Standard v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981