Legal Opinion
Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenors. Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Genstar Chemical Limited v. Interstate Commerce Commission United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Norfolk and Western Railway Company, Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Western Maryland Railway Company, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 25, 1981No. 19-5257PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
665 F.2d 1304
215 U.S.App.D.C. 1
GENSTAR CHEMICAL LIMITED, Petitioner,
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION and United States of America,
Respondents,
Consolidated Rail Corporation, et al., Intervenors.
GENSTAR CHEMICAL LIMITED
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, et al.,
Consolidated Rail Corporation, et al., Appellants.
GENSTAR CHEMICAL LIMITED
v.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION United States of America, Appellants,
Consolidated Rail Corporation, Norfolk and Western Railway
Company, Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company,
Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company,
Western Maryland Railway
Company, Intervenors.
Nos. 80-1170,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Trans Alaska Pipeline Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. ICCSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Davis v. Portland Seed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Overbrook Farmers Union Cooperative Association, and v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994