Andrews v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The sole question before this Court is whether the evidence adduced at trial, considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, was sufficient to justify a reasonable inference that intestate’s death was the proximate result of the alleged negligence of the defendants.
Since the record affirmatively reveals that defendant John R. Taylor, Jr. owned and operated the apartment complex, we initially find that plaintiff has failed to establish any grounds for negligence against defendants John R. Taylor, Sr., Betsy Taylor and John R. Taylor Company, Inc. The judgment in favor…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murrell v. HandleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Hood v. Queen City Coach CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Dunn v. . BombergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Adams v. American Enka Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Haddock v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Younce v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Holland v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lohrenz v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Mucowski v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Yalowizer v. Husky Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.