Legal Opinion
Haddock v. Lassiter
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided May 27, 1970No. 703SC281PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*245HedRICK, J.
In their briefs, the parties stipulated that this Court could consider and determine this appeal on its merits under the appropriate rule of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 12(b) (6), North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure, is as follows:
“ (b) How presented. — Every defense, in law or fact, to a claim for relief in any pleading, whether a claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third-party claim, shall be asserted in the responsive pleading thereto if one is required, except that the following defense may at the option of the pleader be made by motion:
* *
"(6) Failure…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Wagoner v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . StansellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Bailey v. North Carolina R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Everett v. Receivers of Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Andrews v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Clarke v. KerchnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Bamberger v. BernholzCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Kelly v. BrilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Street Ex Rel. Street v. MoffittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.