Legal Opinion

Holland v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1981No. 12429PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

This appeal arises from trial court orders dismissing appellants’ complaint with respect to appellee Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (B & 0), and granting summary judgment on the complaint to appellee Penn Central Transportation Company (Penn Central). The complaint sought damages for injuries suffered by a nine-year-old child who was injured by a train while trespassing on an area of railroad right-of-way where the two appellees maintain contiguous tracks.

In granting B & 0’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, the…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. M. A. P. v. RyanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Ralph D. Smith and Thelma Smith v. Arbaugh's Restaurant, Inc., a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. Bethea v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Ferreira v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Eleanor T. Johnson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  3. McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Choate v. Indiana Harbor Belt R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Michael Belton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API