Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Cicero

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 2014No. 2013-1980PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

{¶ 1} Respondent, Christopher Thomas Cicero of Columbus, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039882, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1988. Relator, disciplinary counsel, has charged Cicero with making a false statement of *7law or fact to a tribunal, in violation of Prof.Cond.R. 3.3(a); engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, in violation of Prof. Cond.R. 8.4(c); engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, in violation of Prof.Cond.R. 8.4(d); and engaging in conduct that adversely reflects on Cicero’s fitness to practice…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. FowerbaughOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. GlatkiOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. RuarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. State v. CallaghanOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  3. State v. PersonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. PhillabaumOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Pollock v. Trustar Funding, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API