Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Cicero
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Relator objects to the board’s report in two significant respects. Relator’s first objection is that the board erred in finding that the relator did not file an amended complaint adding a DR 1-102(A)(4) violation to count one. Relator’s next objection is that the board erred in failing to find a DR 9-101(C) violation under the facts presented at the hearings. Because of a lack of clear and convincing evidence to support either violation, we overrule both the relator’s objections.
*353We adopt the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the board, but impose a more stringent sanction of a…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Disciplinary Counsel v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 2014
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Disciplinary Counsel v. CiceroOhio Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.