In re Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania
District Court, N.D. New York
Motion to Confirm Report in Favor oí Petitioner.
1Opinion of the CourtCoxe, J.
The petitioner is a marine insurance company of the state of Pennsylvania, doing business at Buffalo, in this state, where Crosby and Dimiek are its general agents. They are also agents, either individually or as a firm, of three other marine insurance companies. The companies represented by them are known as the “Big Four.” The barge Waubaushene is a Canadian vessel, registered at Toronto, Ontario. . Her owner, Milton S. May, of London, Canada, applied in March, 1883, to A. H. Dalziel, an insurance agent and broker at Sarnia, Canada, for insurance upon her and other barges owned by him. The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Insurance Co. v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Scudder v. Union National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- The Maggie HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Equilease Corp. v. M/V SampsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- The WabashDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1922
- The Kaiser Wilhelm IIDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
- The Minnie V.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1927
- Lynch Davidson & Co. v. Denman Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.