The Kaiser Wilhelm II
District Court, D. New Jersey
In Admiralty. Suit by Harland & Wolff, Limited, against the steamship Kaiser AVilhelm II; North German Lloyd, claimant. On exceptions to answer of claimant.
1Opinion of the Court
HAIGHT, District Judge.
The questions presented for decision arise on exceptions to the answer of the claimant. The libelant is a British corporation; the vessel libeled is German, and is owned by the claimant, a corporation of the German Empire. The libel alleges, in substance, that in the months of June and July, 1914, the Kaiser Wilhelm II, the vessel against which the libel was filed, was at Southampton, England, in need of certain repairs and supplies, and that upon the order of the owner of the vessel, or a duly authorized agent, the libelant performed certain necessary work and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- James L. v. CarrylSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The John G. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- The Kaiser Wilhelm IICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1917
- Payne v. SS Tropic BreezeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- The KongsliDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1918
- The City of AtlantaDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1927
- American Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.