Frank Cartage Division, Truckway Service, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Appellant claims that the commission’s order is unreasonable and unlawful because no inadequacy-in the present carrier service had been shown or stated in the commission’s order; that the commission should have granted a “60-day order,” pursuant to R. C. 4921.10 and 4921.12, before granting the new certificate; and that the applicant is an improper party to receive a certificate from the commission. The facts and legal issues thus presented are virtually identical, to those in D. G. & U. Truck Lines, Inc., v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1965), 4 Ohio St. 2d 113, 212 N. E. 2d 796, and the principles…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945
- Norwalk Truck Line Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- D. G. & U. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1965
- B. N. Trans. v. P.U.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matador Service, Inc. v. Missouri Basin Well Service, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Stephens v. Public Service Commission of West VirginiaWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987