Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1945No. 29982 and 29983PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.

The first question presented by the appellants for consideration by this court is whether the proposed operation of the Pennsylvania Truck Lines,. Inc., is that of a “motor transportation company” or “common carrier by motor vehicle” as defined by Section 614-84 (a), General Code, which reads in part as follows:

“The term ‘motor transportation company,’ or ‘common carrier by motor vehicle,’ when used in this chapter, shall include, and * * * shall apply to every corporation, company, * * * or copartnership * * * when engaged, or proposing to engage, in the business of transporting persons or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. N.Y. C. Rd. Co. v. P. U. C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. H. & K. Motor Transportation, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. New York Central Rd. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Lake Motor Freight Line, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Norwalk Truck Line Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. D. G. & U. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. B. N. Trans. v. P.U.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Frank Cartage Division, Truckway Service, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API