Legal Opinion

Norwalk Truck Line Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1947No. 30846 and 30839PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSohngen, J.

The first question presented by appellants for consideration by this court is whether the proposed operations of Lake Shore Cartage, Inc., and The Andrews Transfer Company are those of a “motor transportation company” or “common carrier by motor vehicle’’ as defined by Section 614-84 (a), Gen era! Code. The appellants’ contention is that such operations are not, and that the New York Central Railroad Company and the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company are the actual applicants for the certificates.

An examination of the records shows that both Lake Shore Cartage, Inc., and The- Andrews Transfer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland, Columbus & Cincinnati Highway, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1945

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. Public Service CommissionDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1954
  3. D. G. & U. Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Utilities Commission of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. B. N. Trans. v. P.U.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Frank Cartage Division, Truckway Service, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API