Legal Opinion

William I. Horlick Co. v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Co.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided November 28, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 56-36PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

The original service of process in this action, made upon the Massachusetts Commissioner of Corporations and Taxation, was quashed by this court on the ground that Mass.G.L. Ch. 181, § 3A, under which service was purportedly made, did not authorize service on the commissioner where the cause of action did not arise out of business done by the defendant within the state. William I. Horlick Co., Inc., v. Bogue Electric Manufacturing Co., D.C., 140 F.Supp. 514. Thereupon further service of process was *348made upon one Michael K. Scholnick as agent in charge of defendant’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  3. Thurman v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Weiss v. NewmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Trojan Engineering Corp. v. Green Mountain Power Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. White-Rodgers Co. v. District Court of Weld CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  2. Elliott v. Edwards Engineering Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1965
  3. Zucco v. Dobeckmun Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1957
  4. Cle-Ware Industries, Inc. of Puerto Rico v. Harte & Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1969
  5. Corbin v. Bastian Blessing Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API