Zucco v. Dobeckmun Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, District Judge.
With regard to Dobeckmun’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, *370I find that Dobeckmun has an active sales office in Boston which it has maintained for many years; that in addition to soliciting orders, one or more persons in this office, on authorization from the home office, investigate complaints, and possess at least a modicum of authority to settle matters of minor nature on their own initiative. I think it fair to assume that with six permanent salesmen, promotional work, held important in Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co., 328 Mass. 219, 103 N.E.2d 230,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- George P. Converse & Co., Inc. v. Polaroid CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Wyshak v. Anaconda Copper Mining Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
- Denis v. Perfect Parts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1956
- London's, Inc. v. MacK Shirt Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Valdez v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Texas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1974
- City of Leominster v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1962