Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Newman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 4, 1926PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

The master finds that there was no partnership between the plaintiff and the defendants and that the debt of the defendants to the plaintiff is established. Since the evidence is not reported, these findings must stand and be accepted as true unless they are inconsistent with other facts found. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co. 235 Mass. 330. A careful examination of the record shows that there is no such inconsistency. There is no error apparent on the record'. Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co. 243 Mass. 111.

Decree affirmed with costs.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Glover v. Waltham Laundry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  2. Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Pulson v. American Rolling Mill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
  2. American Asphalt Roof Corp. v. ShanklandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  3. Adolph Caso v. Lafayette Radio Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  4. City of St. Paul v. DalsinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Jeter v. Austin Trailer Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API