Legal Opinion

Southern National Bank v. B & E Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1980No. 7916DC891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

The principal question presented in this appeal is whether the trial court properly entered summary judgment under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56 in favor of the plaintiff. The movant has the burden of proving that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Singleton v. *738Stewart, 280 N.C. 460, 186 S.E. 2d 400 (1972). Summary judgment is available to a plaintiff as well as a defendant. Kessing v. Mortgage Corp., 278 N.C. 523, 180 S.E. 2d 823 (1971).

In this case, the fact that the note was at one time marked “paid”, coupled with defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Moore v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Singleton v. StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Havenfield Corp. v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1973
  5. Van Horne v. HinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clements v. Toombs County Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  2. G.E. Capital Mortgage Services, Inc. v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. GE CAPITAL MORTG. SERVICES v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. UNIFUND CCR PARTNERS v. DoverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  5. Allen v. Workers' Compensation Commissioner & Consolidation Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API