Legal Opinion

Van Horne v. Hines

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 7, 1940No. 2379PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Justice. •

The plaintiff made a request under Rule 36, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, asking the defendant to admit the truth of various matters of fact specified. The defendant has served upon the plaintiff a sworn statement admitting in part and denying in part the truth of the matters set out in the request. Such sworn statement was signed by an Assistant United States Attorney of counsel in the case.

Plaintiff complains and moves to strike the sworn statement, contending that the rule requires that the sworn statement shall be signed by the defendant or someone having personal…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Masten v. MastenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Dulansky v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1950
  3. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. CohenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. Sieb's Hatcheries, Inc. v. LindleyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1952
  5. Jones v. Boyd Truck Lines, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API