Legal Opinion

Hercik v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 25, 1991No. 2465 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Before this Court is a petition for review of the November 9, 1989 order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which granted the exceptions filed by John R. Conaway, Jr. and Shirley R. Conaway, co-partners, trading and doing business as Conaway Hearse and Limousine Sales (Conaway), to the initial decision of Administrative Law Judge, Richard S. Herskovitz (ALJ), denying Cona*379way’s application for a certificate of public convenience to operate a limousine service. The PUC’s order granted Conaway’s application as restrictively amended by Conaway. Petitioner, Thomas A.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brinks, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. National Retail Transportation, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Purolator Security, Inc. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Morgan Drive Away, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Toney v. Dept. of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. South River Power Partners, L.P. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API