Legal Opinion
Purolator Security, Inc. v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 17, 1977No. Appeals, Nos. 787 and 824 C.D. 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
Purolator Security, Inc. and Brinks, Incorporated (appellants) have each appealed from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) which held that WEB, Inc.’s (intervening appellee) activities had been within the scope of its certificated authority. These appeals have been consolidated.
In 1951, Ray Slater applied for, and after a hearing, was granted, a certificate of public convenience1 which authorized him:
To transport, as a Class B carrier, property between points in the city and county of Philadelphia. (Emphasis added.)
*178In 1972, the Slater certificate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- W. J. Dillner Transfer Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Commonwealth v. Brink's, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Ferry v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- T. M. Zimmerman Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
3Cited by8 opinions
- Park Towne & Madway Engineers & Constructors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Brinks, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Delaware Valley Transportation Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Hercik v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Burgit v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.