Legal Opinion
United States v. Kramer
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 8, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-4340(JFG)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERRY, Chief Judge.
BACKGROUND 1
The parties are presently before the court upon third-party defendants’ motion to sever and stay the third-party claims filed against them, and upon the United States' motion for amendment of a case management order. Plaintiffs, the United States and the State of New Jersey, brought this case pursuant to section 107(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 2 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a), to recover response costs expended at the Helen Kramer Landfill in Mantua, New Jersey. The United States has sued twenty-nine…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. KramerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Gold v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Barnes v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Rohm & Haas Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Rodin Properties-Shore Mall v. Cushman & Wakefield of Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Active Products Corp. v. A.H. Choitz & Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 2003
- CHASE v. CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.