Legal Opinion

Barnes v. Cohen

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 23, 1984No. Nos. 84-1043, 84-5063 and 84-5064PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ROSENN, Circuit Judge.

In 1981, Congress, as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA), Pub.L. No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 357 (1981), revised the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program by providing that “specified” AFDC beneficiaries who receive lump-sum income in excess of their monthly standard of need are ineligible for program assistance for a specific period of time regardless of whether the lump sum is still actually available. The issue common to the two cases consolidated for the appeal now before us is whether the “lump-sum” provision applicable…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. United States v. Stephen A. KnoxCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Joseph KRYSZTOFORSKI, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. Silver v. BaggianoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Ofchinick, Daniel R. (Jr.). Appeal of Daniel Ofchinick, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Garcia v. Community Legal Services Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API