Legal Opinion
Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 24, 2003No. CIV91-1764 PHX-DAE (LOA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ANDERSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter arises on the motion of Defendant Atlantic Richfield Company (“Atlantic Richfield”) to bifurcate trial on the issue of Atlantic Richfield’s alleged “operator” and “arranger” liability for activities conducted at the facilities of Phelps Dodge Miami, Inc. (“Phelps Dodge” or “PDMI”) and Inspiration Consolidated Copper Company (“Inspiration”) within the Pinal Creek Drainage Basin, a hazardous waste site in Arizona, (document # 1333-1) Atlantic Richfield further requests that the Court implement “special procedures” to “streamline the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Diane MILLER and Pamela Lewis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FAIRCHILD INDUSTRIES, INC., a Maryland Corporation, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Kalamazoo River Study Group v. Menasha Corporation Eaton Corporation, Rockwell International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. The Boeing CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023