Legal Opinion

Durling v. Lamontain

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 10, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a pedestrian upon a public way, through contact with an automobile driven by the defendant. There was testimony tending to show that on a rainy night the plaintiff, on stepping from the westerly sidewalk of a street sixty feet wide between sidewalks with a plainly marked crosswalk ten feet in width, looked up and down the street and, seeing no automobile, started to cross within the lines of the crosswalk; that when within three or four feet of the opposite sidewalk he was struck…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Barrett v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Quinn v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. McGuiggan v. AtkinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Texeira v. SundquistMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
  3. Clark v. C. E. Fay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Spain v. OikemusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. McSorley v. RisdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API