Durling v. Lamontain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
This is an action of tort to recover compensation for personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff, a pedestrian upon a public way, through contact with an automobile driven by the defendant. There was testimony tending to show that on a rainy night the plaintiff, on stepping from the westerly sidewalk of a street sixty feet wide between sidewalks with a plainly marked crosswalk ten feet in width, looked up and down the street and, seeing no automobile, started to cross within the lines of the crosswalk; that when within three or four feet of the opposite sidewalk he was struck…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- O'Connor v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Barrett v. Checker Taxi Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
- Quinn v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGuiggan v. AtkinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Texeira v. SundquistMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Clark v. C. E. Fay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- Spain v. OikemusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
- McSorley v. RisdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.