Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Hickey
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided September 11, 1929PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBugg, C.J.
When this case was here before, 260 Mass. 110, it was settled that the issues of the due care of the plaintiff’s intestate and the negligence of the servant of the defendant were questions of fact for the jury. In legal aspects material to those issues, the evidence on the present record is not essentially different from that at the former trial. It would be futile to review the evidence or repeat the discussion. Those issues are foreclosed in favor of the plaintiff.
The defendant has argued that the evidence is not sufficient to warrant a finding of actively intelligent and energetic…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Railroad Co. v. GladmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Northern Pacific Railway Company v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bergeron v. ForestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kelley v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Thibeault v. PooleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Wainwright v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Gregory v. Maine Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Bratton v. RudnickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.