Legal Opinion
Spain v. Oikemus
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 28, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.
Compensation is sought in this action for personal injuries received by the plaintiff in consequence of being struck by an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. There was evidence tending to show that the plaintiff, at about nine o’clock on a sleety December morning, on the southerly side of a main highway, was awaiting an easterly bound trolley car at its regular stopping place. A deep bank of snow three or four feet in width was at the edge of the sidewalk. Automobiles were parked closely, both on the right and on the left of the plaintiff, along the side of the street next the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lonergan v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- O'Connor v. HickeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Hennessey v. MoynihanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Doyle v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Herman v. SladofskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Goyette v. AmorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Levin v. Twin Tanners, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Sherwood v. RadovskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- McKeague v. Henry Jenkins Transportation Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.