Legal Opinion

State v. Matthews

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1994No. DC 91D 102961; CA A79394; SC S41114PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

The issue in this case is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that, under ORS 810.410(3)(b), a police officer may stop and detain the driver of a vehicle if the officer has a “reasonable basis” to believe that the driver committed a traffic infraction. State v. Matthews, 126 Or App 154, 157, 868 P2d 14 (1994). We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

On the night of May 22, 1991, Officer Frye was driving on a rural highway when he noticed that the headlights of defendant’s oncoming truck were shining into his eyes. Frye turned around, followed defendant, and pulled him over.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. BeaOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. DohertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. WatsonOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. Arreola-BotelloOregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. TiffinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. State v. McBroomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  5. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API