Legal Opinion
Cho Ex Rel. Situated v. City of N.Y.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 2018No. Docket 18-337-cv; August Term, 2018PublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gerard E. Lynch, Circuit Judge:
This case requires us to consider the application of the Rooker - Feldman doctrine where plaintiffs complain of injuries flowing from settlement agreements that were "so-ordered" by state-court judges. Plaintiffs-Appellants Sung Cho, Nagle Washrite LLC (Cho's business entity), David Diaz, and Jameelah El-Shabazz appeal from a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Andrew L. Carter, Judge ) dismissing their complaint. Plaintiffs-Appellants are all individuals or businesses that were subject to eviction based on New…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Littlejohn v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by152 opinions
- Dorce v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- Hunter v. McMahonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- T.M. v. University of Maryland Medical System CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
- Edwards v. McMillen Capital, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2020
- Desir v. Fla. Capital Bank, N.A.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.