First Phoenix Realty Investments v. Superior Court
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANKFORD, Judge.
First Phoenix Realty Investments (“First Phoenix”) brings this special action to challenge the jurisdiction of the superior court to appoint a receiver in a nonjudicial foreclosure action. We accept jurisdiction be cause the question presented is an issue of law of statewide significance. See City of Flagstaff v. Mangum, 164 Ariz. 395, 397, 793 P.2d 548, 550 (1990); Summerfield v. Superior Court, 144 Ariz. 467, 469, 698 P.2d 712, 714 (1985).
The issue is whether Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 33-702(B)(l) authorizes the superior court to appoint a receiver when no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Summerfield v. Superior Court, Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 2 v. Phoenix Employee Relations BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- City of Flagstaff v. MangumArizona Supreme Court · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aaron v. Rosepink (In Re Global Grounds Greenery, LLC)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2009
- In re B.S.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Johnson Utilities LLC v. Arizona CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- Umb Bank v. ParkviewCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2023