Kerrigan v. Maloof
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
This is an action brought under section 785 of the Code of Civil Procedure by Kerrigan, referee in partition, against Zerefa Maloof, a defaulting bidder, to recover the difference between the sale price as bid by Maloof and confirmed by the court, and the price obtained on a second partition sale. Maloof cross-complained for $8,000, the amount of her deposit. At the close of the trial before a jury the trial court directed a verdict in favor of Kerrigan on all issues, and judgment was entered accordingly. Thereafter, on motion of Maloof, a new trial was granted “on insufficiency of evidence…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Fay v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Katz v. HaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Goldsworthy v. DobbinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Syrek v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Union Bank v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991