Legal Opinion
City of Tulsa v. Davis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 9, 1962No. 39933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLACKBIRD, Vice Chief Justice.
Roy William Davis, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that while employed by the City of Tulsa he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment on the 22nd day of February, 1961, when he fell from a chair on to a concrete floor. An award for temporary disability was entered and the City of Tulsa, own risk hereinafter called petitioner, has brought this proceeding to review the award.
The evidence discloses that claimant was employed in the water and sewer department.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- City of Kingfisher v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Nash Finch Co. v. HarnedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Spaur v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Payton v. City of AnadarkoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jarvis v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Hieronimus v. Phillips Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- McKosky v. Town of TalihinaCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1983