Legal Opinion
Hieronimus v. Phillips Petroleum Company
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 4, 1969No. 43285PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Vice Chief Justice.
This is an original proceeding to review an order of the State Industrial Court denying the petitioner, claimant below, benefits under the provisions of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation Act.
Parties will be referred to as they appeared before the State Industrial Court. Respondent is engaged in the petroleum business operating gasoline plants, refineries and other plants connected with the manufacture of petroleum products. The general business of the respondent is “hazardous” within the provisions of 85 O.S. 1961, §§ 2 and 3 of the Oklahoma Workmen’s Compensation…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McQuiston v. Sun CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Enid Sand & Gravel Co. v. MagruderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- City of Tulsa v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Teaney v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- K. C. Auto Hotel v. CaugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Williams v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
- International Spa v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Huffman v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Hissom Memorial Center v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.