Legal Opinion
City of Kingfisher v. Jenkins
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 19, 1934No. 25300PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.
This is an original proceeding in this court by the city of Kingfisher and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company to review an order of the Industrial Commission awarding compensation to C. R. Jenkins.
The respondent O. R. Jenkins alleges that while in the employ of the petitioner city of Kingfisher, he sustained an injury consisting of a wrenched knee received while handling and working on a city truck and in the line of duty.
The Commission found that he sustained an accidental injury as claimed, and that by reason of such injury he sustained a 25 per cent, permanent partial loss of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. ClowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Eagle-Picher Lead Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. HiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Choctaw County v. BatemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Young v. NeelySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Fain Drilling Co. v. DeatherageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Highway Department v. PowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- MARBY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. MitchellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.