Legal Opinion

Taney v. Penn National Bank of Reading

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 26, 1914No. 115PublishedCited by 37 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the relative rights of the trustee in bankruptcy, and the holder as security for loans of warehouse receipts for whiskey in a distilling warehouse issued by the distiller, are stated ih the opinion.

Read the full summary

APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the relative rights of the trustee in bankruptcy, and the holder as security for loans of warehouse receipts for whiskey in a distilling warehouse issued by the distiller, are stated ih the opinion. Either actual delivery by payment of tax and release of the whiskey for that purpose, or constructive delivery by removal to a general bonded warehouse and delivery of its warehouse receipt, was practicable, but neither means was adopted. No constructive or symbolical delivery could be or was made by the…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hughes

On February 3, 1908, a petition in bankruptcy was filed against the Miller Pure Rye Distilling Company; it was adjudicated a bankrupt on February 19, 1908, and the appellant was appointed trustee. The Penn National Bank of Reading, Pennsylvania, the appellee, intervened in the bankruptcy proceeding with a petition asking for the delivery to it of two hundred barrels of whiskey stored in the bonded warehouse of the distilling company, upon the ground that the property had been lawfully pledged by the company to the bank. The District Court sustained the lien and accordingly held the claimant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. CassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Thompson v. FairbanksSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Hiscock v. Varick Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  5. Security Warehousing Co. v. HandSupreme Court of the United States · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Wood v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  3. Dale v. PattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Dale v. PattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Lederer v. Railway Terminal & Warehouse Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API