Legal Opinion
Dale v. Pattison
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 8, 1914No. 330PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
234 U.S. 399 (1914)
DALE
v.
PATTISON.
No. 330.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued April 23, 1914.
Decided June 8, 1914.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
Mr. Lee Warren James for appellants.
Mr. W.H. Mackoy, with whom Mr. M.L. Buchwalter was on the brief, for appellee.
MR. JUSTICE PITNEY, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.
The transactions in question, as between Rohrer, the bankrupt, and Pattison, the appellee, are not distinguishable from those that were under consideration in Taney v. Penn Bank, 232 U.S. 174. In that case the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taney v. Penn National Bank of ReadingSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Dale v. PattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cissell v. First Nat. Bank of CincinnatiDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- Live Stock State Bank v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Homan v. Kemba Cincinnati Credit Union (In Re Homan)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Thompson v. H. Rouw Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Mississippi Valley Trust Co. v. Railway Steel Spring Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.