Legal Opinion
Mazur v. Blum
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 5, 1981PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Per curiam
The plaintiff is a teacher, employee of the Stamford board of education, and member of the Stamford Federation of Teachers. He commenced an action 2 seeking to correct, modify, or vacate an award entered pursuant to the state compulsory binding arbitration statute governing collective bargaining disputes between municipalities and teachers’ unions. Public Acts 1979, No. 79-405, now General Statutes § 10-153f. The named defendants were Peter R. Blum and Leonard Rovins, the arbitrators who entered the award, and Elhanan Stone and Richard Bieder, negotiators for the Stamford board of education…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Doe v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Jones v. Civil Service CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Town of Winchester v. Connecticut State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Hayes v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.