Legal Opinion

Rosenman v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1945No. 207PublishedCited by 241 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter

This is an action upon a claim for refund of a federal estate tax, and the specific question before us is whether the claim was asserted too late. The matter is governed by § 319 (b) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 9, 84, as amended by § 810 (a) of the Revenue Act of 1932, 47 Stat. 169, 282, 26 U. S. C. § 910, reading as follows:

“All claims for the refunding of the tax imposed by this title alleged to have been erroneously or illegally assessed or collected must be presented to the Commissioner within three years next after the payment of such tax. The amount of the refund shall not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. WurtsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Busser v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. Moses v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
  4. Rosenman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1944
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1941

3Cited by241 opinions

  1. Jones v. Liberty Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. New York Life Insurance Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. Kavanagh v. NobleSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Walter Goodman v. City Products Corporation, Ben Franklin DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970

236 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API