Legal Opinion

United States v. Wurts

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 14, 1938No. 499PublishedCited by 257 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Under the Revenue Act of 1928, 1 forbidding suit by the United States to recover an erroneous tax refund unless brought “within two years after the making of such refund,” does the two year limitation begin when the refund is allowed or when it is paid?

The Court of Appeals affirmed 2 the District Court’s judgment holding the Government barred by this limitation because the present suit was not brought within two years after the Commissioner allowed the refund by signing the schedule of over-assessments.

The facts show that:

March 15, 1932, the Commissioner erroneously approved a refund of taxes…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Union Pacific Railroad v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. United States v. Bank of the MetropolisSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  5. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by257 opinions

  1. Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. United States v. SillimanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  5. United States v. Lahey Clinic Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005

252 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API