Legal Opinion

New York Life Insurance Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 26, 1997No. 20-1966PublishedCited by 110 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The question on the merits is whether money remitted to the Internal Revenue Service (the Service) constituted a “deposit” or a “payment” of taxes. If a deposit, the taxpayer is entitled to recover it; if a payment, the taxpayer can recover the money only after it files a claim with the Service for the return of an “overpayment.” The Court of Federal Claims held that it had jurisdiction over this suit for recovery of the remitted money and that the remittance was a deposit, which the taxpayer was entitled to recover. We affirm both rulings.

I

In computing its…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. United States v. Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by110 opinions

  1. Cyprus Amax Coal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  2. Cottrell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  3. National Air Traffic Controllers Association v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Griswold v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API