Legal Opinion

Rosenman v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 7, 1944No. 45197PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Judge.

Plaintiffs, as the executors of the last will and testament of Louis Rosenman, sue to recover estate taxes alleged to have been erroneously exacted. The claim is based upon their right to deduct from the gross estate sums for executors’ commissions, attorneys’ fees, miscellaneous expenses, and an item of $25,000 paid to Martin Rosenman in settlement of a claim he presented against the estate.

The items of executors’ commissions, attorneys’ fees, and miscellaneous expenses are not in dispute, but defendant denies that the estate is entitled to the deduction of the $25,000 paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Latty v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  2. United States v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
  3. Glascock v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  4. Atlantic Oil Producing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Dubuque Packing Company, a Corporation, Dubuque Packing Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  3. Hanley v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  4. Estate of Reilly v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  5. Budd Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API