Legal Opinion

State v. Gaskill

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 16, 2012No. 211000399; A145097PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to and was convicted of third-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.415. The trial court sentenced him to 36 months of supervised probation, subject to several general and special conditions. Defendant now appeals, contending that the trial court erred in imposing special conditions of probation that prohibited him from having contact with minors or frequenting places where minors congregate. Defendant argues that those conditions are not reasonably related to his current offense or past offenses and that the trial court failed to otherwise create a sufficient factual record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. QualeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Weems v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  4. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BordersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. MaackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. GalloCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API