Legal Opinion

State v. Crocker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 12, 1989No. 87-CR-1724, 87-CR-1725; CA A46952PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In our original opinion issued February 22, 1989, 95 Or App 260 (1989), we dismissed this appeal, because defendant had pleaded guilty, imposition of sentence had been suspended and defendant had been granted probation, which, under State v. Carmickle, 307 Or 1, 762 P2d 290 (1988), was not a “sentence” within the meaning of ORS 138.050. 1 Because we believed that that statute alone governs appeals after a defendant had pleaded guilty and because there had been no sentence, we concluded that there was no right to appeal.

On March 7,1989, the Supreme Court handed down State v. Donovan, 307 Or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CarmickleOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. CrockerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. State v. CoreauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  3. State v. GaskillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. State v. AltmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. State v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API