Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 21, 2016No. 131798; A156129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, P. J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of first-degree theft, ORS 164.055, two counts of first-degree official misconduct, ORS 162.415, and two counts of tampering with physical evidence, ORS 162.295. On appeal, defendant challenges two special conditions of probation, ORS 137.540(2), imposed by the trial court: (1) a spending restriction prohibiting her from spending more than $250 on nonordinary household items without permission and (2) a geographic restriction precluding her from leaving Lincoln County without permission. Defendant contends that the challenged conditions are not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. Hitesman/PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. State v. FerreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. State v. DonahueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferry v. Bd. of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. State v. HuritaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  3. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. ForbesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API